Skip to main content

The Future: AI & Scaling

Governance in crypto is evolving. As networks grow more complex, the systems that manage them must also scale β€” not just in users and proposals, but in intelligence, autonomy, and resilience.

House of Stake is laying the foundation for next-generation governance, where tools, agents, and coordination mechanisms matter as much as β€” if not more than β€” individual votes.


AI-Assisted Governance​

We’re entering an era where governance will be increasingly AI-augmented. This doesn’t mean handing the keys over to machines β€” it means building smarter support systems that make human decision-making more informed, inclusive, and efficient.

Phase 1: The Assistant​

AI today can already:

  • Summarize proposals, flag inconsistencies, and track delegate behavior
  • Draft or critique proposals based on protocol context and past examples
  • Provide real-time, contextual advice rooted in law, economics, and community norms
  • Serve as a "PhD-level co-pilot" for delegates navigating complex ecosystems

The first milestone is embedding such assistants into governance platforms like Agora or Tally β€” as bots trained on governance archives, protocol mechanics, legal theory, and social norms. These tools can make participation more accessible, reduce delegate burnout, and strengthen accountability.

Phase 2: The Delegate​

The logical next step is the AI delegate β€” an autonomous agent that performs most governance functions:

  • Reviewing and voting on proposals
  • Participating in discussions
  • Explaining decisions based on encoded values
  • Acting as a low-cost, neutral, always-on stakeholder

Communities could spin up many such agents, each trained with different priorities or behavioral logic. Through experimentation, we’ll learn which models earn real trust and deliver real impact.

Phase 3: The President​

The long-term vision β€” still speculative β€” is the AI president: a master coordination agent overseeing protocol governance with transparency, neutrality, and continuous availability.

This would require:

  • Checks and balances β€” human override mechanisms akin to courts or councils
  • Constituent communication β€” infinite parallel conversations, avatar interfaces
  • Ethical design β€” fairness, self-restraint, and clear alignment with community will

Whether such a system is desirable or possible depends not just on technical feasibility β€” but on social trust and how we encode governance values into autonomous agents.

For a deeper exploration of this three-stage vision, check out: Three Stages of AI Governance – by Illia Polosukhin & co


Scalable Infrastructure​

To support this evolution, House of Stake promotes:

  • On-chain voting & transparent records β€” reducing coordination friction
  • Versioned, modular governance β€” enabling safe upgrades and experimentation
  • Automation tools & clear roles β€” improving speed and reducing human error

The Vision​

House of Stake is not just about fixing governance β€” it’s about reinventing it.

We imagine a future where governance is:

  • User-owned
  • Agent-assisted
  • Continuously improving

The ultimate goal: governance that scales with the ecosystem β€” in efficiency, inclusiveness, and resilience β€” powered by humans and machines working together.